| |
I started playing at age 7. I had tried to persuade my parents to get
me a guitar for the previous two years, and finally...on my 7th birthday...there
it was; A plastic Eminee. I still have it.
I really loved the music I heard in school like, The Firebird and Fingals
Cave. That was my first record. And the Beatles. I learned to play listening
to that stuff. I had a few lessons when I was about 8, but they had no
bearing on the music I listened to so I quit and tried to teach myself.
I always a love of some classical music and contemporary pop, like The
Beatles, Cream, and The Allman Brothers Band.
By
the time I was 12, I was playing in bands and doing little gigs. I finally
got some basic music training in high school. But my playing was way ahead
of any formal knowledge. By the time I went to college, I decided I wanted
to be a musician, and realized that I'd better get busy making up for
lost time. I began studying classical guitar with Alice Artzt, in New
York City and what I'll call "advanced harmonic concepts" with
Dennis Sandole in Philadelphia. I left college after my first year with
the idea of going to a conservatory. After looking around at schools,
I felt that the private lessons I had with these two people was better
for me.
So I returned to college and kept up with the private study. I got the
formal harmony, counterpoint and music history stuff in school, and the
more intensive instrumental and conceptual training privately; once a
week to NYC and once a month with four lessons at a time to Philadelphia.
I stopped the classical guitar study after 4 years. I stayed with Dennis
Sandole for almost 13 years. After college, I played in an original rock
band for about a year and a half, then decided it was time to try to make
a "living" as a musician. I bounced around the New Jersey/Philadelphia
wedding band scene for a few years, and eventually landed a steady gig
that lasted 12 years. I did some teaching during the week and played gigs
on the weekends. That steady gig ended in 2001.
Around the middle of 1984, the collision of several ideas set me on a
course that transformed my musical life dramatically. I always wanted
to get more out of the electric guitar. I heard it used in all its myriad
styles, but I wanted to use it as a serious compositional vehicle. The
classical guitar was just not for me. It seemed too limited, and I come
from rock music and the ELECTRIC guitar. To me, that's a huge untapped
region. The thing is so expressive and can be so varied; It was MY instrument.
But the kind of music and scope that I had in mind didn't exist. I had
all this western classical music tradition in my background, professional
playing experience, and all the Dennis Sandole tutelage. But nothing to
unite everything into a single conceptual direction. Then I SAW Alan Holdsworth.
I had been listening to him for a few years and really liked his playing
and writing. He seemed to have found his own take on the" jazz tune"
format, but there was such a European sensibility in it all that really
set it apart from the "pack". When I saw him play in late 1984,
he used his right hand to add notes to chords in "Tokyo Dream".
He only did it in the one tune. In that moment, everything came together.
The guitar was a string quartet. The guitar was an orchestra. The guitar
was a piano. But the guitar was none of these things. It was really its
own NEW universe (See "What Is Black Loam"?). When I got home,
I started looking at everything differently. And at my next Sandole lesson,
I showed him my "discovery". He sat back in his arm chair and
said that he had experimented with this technique long ago. He said he
had waited fifty years for a student to stumble on it in a natural way.
I started writing music for two-handed guitar. I wanted to create a literature
that would exploit this idea of the electric guitar as a viable, serious
instrument. And in the process, explore what it could do and how to play
it. Around this time, Stanley Jordan's first album appeared. I had heard
him in 1980 at a little gig in Princeton. But the sound and concept that
he was presenting were not headed in the direction I wanted to go. So
I never gave it a second thought. But at this point, I had found my direction.
One that united all my different backgrounds, skills, and aesthetic aspirations.
I wanted a place where I could express myself. And this was IT!!
Problems quickly emerged. The tonal weight and dynamic range of a tapped
note is much less convincing than a plucked note. The action on the guitar
had to be low and the entire instrument had to be lively and clear since
every range of the thing was now potentially in play. I found that the
amp had to be run with more gain to get the notes to thicken up. But the
instrument itself was an obstacle. Then I saw an interview with Ned Steinberger
in the December 1984 issue of Guitar Player Magazine. He was holding a
Steinberger guitar. This instrument had just been released. A friend of
mine named Don Greenwald, who owned a music store in Poughkeepsie NY,
had mentioned that he thought I should try one of these things. He was
near the factory, and was friends with Ned. When I SAW the picture of
Ned Steinberger holding that guitar, I KNEW!!! That thing was EXACTLY
what I needed to make the tapping work. It was stable, so the action could
be low and not need constant attention. The sound was powerful, and it
was even. All the notes would be clear and usable. I bought one. Together
with Ron Ruggiero, a Philadelphia luthier, we found the right action and
set up to allow me to play the tapping stuff and still use the guitar
for regular playing styles. So now I could use the thing at gigs. I decided
to explore standards and pop tunes as a way of developing my technique,
and get a set of practical skills together for use on the gig. I created
an elaborate set of exercises to help me gain fluency in both the standards
and pop playing, and for my own compositions. Now I could function as
a soloist the way my piano-playing friends did. I never really liked the
standard melody-and-chord guitar style. This approach gave me way more
flexibility and was unusual. And it sounded good too.
Other problems quickly emerged. The hands were always in each others way,
although that allows for pull-offs and rhythmic interjections that are
really useful. The sounds that the two hands make cannot be separated.
You can't have a clean sound for one hand and a distorted sound for the
other. So one night on the way home from a gig, I thought of this idea
of separate necks. Not separate guitars, That would be too unwieldy. But
a double-neck guitar with separate outputs might well solve my problems.
Steinberger Sound would not build such a thing. It would be too expensive.
But they did make a double-neck out of wood with synthetic necks. I would
have to settle for a customized version that. They built it, and I used
it for about 5 years. Then in 1996, they agreed to make a double-neck
out of two of their normal synthetic instruments. They joined them together,
and you'd never know it wasn't really one instrument.
That's the basic story. Along the way, I've written string quartets, an
octet for winds and strings, some orchestral music, and a lot of music
for double-neck electric guitar. Through the magic of computer technology,
I can record and disseminate any music I care to write. This approach
has allowed me to explore my musical temperament on my own terms and in
my own time. Acceptance of this music and approach has not been very encouraging.
I think I have a foot in two very different camps. The "pop"
guys don't know what to make of the writing or the guitar, and the "serious"
guys don't know what to make of the guitar or the writing. The music is
an organically conceived synthesis of Bach Mozart, Hendrix, Beethoven,
The Beatles, Duane Allman, Debussy, Charles Ives, Bartok, Dennis Sandole,
Alan Holdsworth...just an assortment of great music and musicians. I hope
that any listener might see the intent and hear something in it.
Steve Hayden April 2005
|